June 26, 2012

sending nothing but power to Sylvia Rivera Law Project member and all around brilliant bad ass Ida Hammer!

transfeminism:

Ida Hammer attempts to talk to Cathy Brennan after the NYC Dyke March 2012

New York City—On June 23, 2012, Ida Hammer approached Cathy Brennan in Washington Square Park after the Dyke March in order to clarify that the NYC Dyke March supports all women whether they are cis, trans or otherwise.

This interaction was prompted by a number of women who attended the march coming up to Ms. Hammer to express concerns about how Ms. Brennan has been targeting women and girls because they are trans. Ms. Hammer asked if these people would like to go talk to Brennan in person.

Ms. Hammer approached Ms. Brennan and said welcome to the New York City Dyke March where we support trans women. Ms. Brennan did not seem intimidated or threatened by this welcome and said she too supports trans women. Ms. Hammer tried to have a discussion with Ms. Brennan about the concerns the women who approached her had with her aggressively targeting and harassing women and girls.

As you can see in this video captured by a bystander, Ms. Hammer is unable to communicate these concerns as Ms. Brennan continues to talk over her. So Ms. Hammer exits the conversation. Ms. Brennan continues to talk with the other women moving to another area of the park.

Later that night, Ms. Hammer posted on Twitter:

“The @NYCDykeMarch is for ALL women! All self-identified women are welcome. All lesbian, bi and queer women whether cis or trans.”

Ms. Brennan replied on Twitter:

“@IdaHammer @NYCDykeMarch except wbw are not welcome. And you assaulted me. Well done dyke march! Video forthcoming.”

Ms. Brennan is encouraged to post the video she has of her interaction with Ms. Hammer as a video response.

Ms. Hammer has not interacted with Ms. Brennan before or after the conversation at Washington Square Park, yet Ms. Brennan has since been aggressively targeting Ms. Hammer with the very harassment that Ms. Hammer wanted to have a discussion about with Ms. Brennan.

  1. thewallflowerintheback reblogged this from transfeminism
  2. baeddelfeme reblogged this from transfeminism
  3. musicnote95 reblogged this from its-only-make-believe
  4. its-only-make-believe reblogged this from transfeminism
  5. thispainshallpassaway reblogged this from lookatthisfuckingoppressor
  6. lookatthisfuckingoppressor reblogged this from smittened
  7. smittened reblogged this from punlich
  8. xmasandribena reblogged this from thepaisleywind
  9. thisspinsterlife reblogged this from takemetoponyisland
  10. thevitaes reblogged this from gcvsa
  11. zhinxy reblogged this from valeriekeefe and added:
    Yes. Though video evidence probably isn’t gonna alter inTERFretations of the “assault”.
  12. telegantmess reblogged this from tal9000
  13. wrcsolace reblogged this from transfeminism
  14. witchyautisticweirdo reblogged this from transfeminism
  15. abatado reblogged this from impromptuonedykedanceparty and added:
    Yeah, this is basically how I imagined it went down and calling this “assault” in pretty insulting and belittling of...
  16. impromptuonedykedanceparty reblogged this from fivelettered
  17. fucknoradfems reblogged this from punlich
  18. quixoticlyqueer reblogged this from dissthepiecesonja
  19. workingforvacation reblogged this from scooterpiebanana and added:
    Brennan, you simpleton. You’ve just issued irrefutable proof that not only were you not assaulted (a word you clearly...
  20. tal9000 reblogged this from lucypaw and added:
    There are a lot more commonalities than this cartoon points out. Even the tactics are the same:
  21. dansmell666 reblogged this from smilingwithcats
  22. smilingwithcats reblogged this from pardonmewhileipanic
  23. cloakable reblogged this from lucypaw
  24. thelovesongofjaygatsby reblogged this from megidophilia